Skip to main content
Log in

Developing vernal pool conservation plans at the local level using citizen-scientists

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Use of citizen-scientists to collect data on natural resources is gaining credibility globally and is now considered a valuable tool in the conservation tool box. We conducted town-wide vernal pool inventories using citizen-scientists in four New England towns (USA) using voluntary best development practices (BDPs) for vernal pools. We tested the efficacy of using citizen-scientists to collect field data on vernal pools using published BDP guidelines. Steps included pool mapping and inventory, training of citizen-scientists, vernal pool field assessments, and guiding town development of local conservation strategies using data provided by the project. Potential vernal pools were remotely identified and photointerpreted. Partnerships among the University of Maine, the towns, and non-governmental organizations were forged to implement the project in spring 2003. Local coordinators in each town recruited volunteer citizen-scientists to conduct ground assessments. Volunteer training sessions were held prior to and during the field season. Fifty-two citizen-scientists surveyed and assessed 262 vernal pools. Quality control tests in the field confirmed that citizen-scientist data on amphibian egg mass counts were not significantly different from data gathered by biologists. Each pool was given a conservation priority rating based on the BDP assessment. Data were entered into a Geographic Information System database and delivered to each town. All towns initiated conservation plans and are developing conservation mechanisms to protect pools recognized as having conservation priority. Town strategies ranged from amending existing ordinances to improve wetland protection to incorporation of vernal pool resources into larger biodiversity mapping and planning projects. These four case studies illustrate that vernal pool conservation initiatives can be developed in local communities using the skills of trained citizen-scientists to collect accurate data. Communities are then better able to incorporate pool conservation strategies into the local planning and regulatory processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Baldwin, R. F., A. J. K. Calhoun, and P. G. deMaynadier. 2006. Conservation planning for amphibian species with complex habitat requirements: a case study using movements and habitat selection of the wood frog Rana sylvatica. Journal of Herpetology 40: 443–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beginning with Habitat. 2003. http://www.beginningwithhabitat. org/index.html.

  • Berkes, F. 2004. Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18: 621–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burne, M. R. 2001. Massachusetts Aerial Photo Survey of Potential Vernal Pools. Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife. Westborough, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burne, M. R. and R. G. Lathrop. Remote and field identification of vernal pools. In A. J. K. Calhoun and P. deMaynadier (eds.) Science and Conservation of Vernal Pools in Northeastern North America. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, in press.

  • Brody, S. D., V. Carrasco, and W. Highfield. 2003. Evaluating ecosystem management capabilities at the local level in Florida: Identifying policy gaps using geographic information systems. Environmental Management 32: 661–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byron, I. and A. Curtis. 2002. Maintaining volunteer commitment to local watershed initiatives. Environmental Management 30: 59–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, A. J. K. and P. deMaynadier. 2004. Forestry habitat management guidelines for vernal pool wildlife in Maine. Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife. Wildlife Conservation Society Technical Paper #6, Rye, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, A. J. K. and M. W. Klemens. 2002. Best development practices: Conserving pool-breeding amphibians in residential and commercial developments in the northeastern United States. MCA Technical Paper No. 5, Metropolitan Conservation Alliance, Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, A. J. K., N. A. Miller, and M. W. Klemens. 2005. Conserving pool-breeding amphibians in human-dominated landscapes through local implementation of Best Development Practices. Wetlands Ecology and Management 13: 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, A. J. K., T. E. Walls, M. McCollough, and S. Stockwell. 2003. Developing conservation strategies for vernal pools: a Maine case study. Wetlands 23: 70–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, A. J. K. and P. Reilly. Conserving vernal pool habitat through community based conservation. In A. J. K. Calhoun and P. deMaynadier (eds.) Science and Conservation of Vernal Pools in Northeastern North America. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, in press.

  • Colburn, E. A. 2004. Vernal Pools: Natural History and Conservation. McDonald and Woodward Publishing Company, Blacksburg, VA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colburn, E. A., S. Weeks, and S. Reed. Diversity and ecology of vernal pool invertebrates. In A. J. K. Calhoun and P. deMaynadier (eds.) Science and Conservation of Vernal Pools in Northeastern North America. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, in press.

  • Cort, C. A. 1996. A survey of the use of natural heritage data in local land-use planning. Conservation Biology 10: 632–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, S. A. 2006. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biological Conservation 128: 231–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing, D. M., C. Winer, and L. D. Wood. 2003. Navigating through the Clean Water Act jurisdiction: a legal review. Wetlands 23: 475–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, S. R. and J. R. Voshell Jr. 2002. Volunteer biological monitoring: Can it accurately assess the ecological condition of streams? American Entomologist 48: 164–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fore, L. S., Paulsen, K., and K. O’Laughlin. 2001. Assessing the performance of volunteers in monitoring streams. Freshwater Biology 46: 109–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, E. H. C. 2005. Correlates of vernal pool occurrence in the Massachusetts, USA landscape. Wetlands 25: 480–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, E., D. Fletcher, and M. Shortis. 2001. A comparison of the precision and accuracy of estimates of reef-fish lengths determined visually by divers with estimates produced by a stereo-video system. Fishery Bulletin 99: 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joly, P., C. Morand, and A. Cohas. 2003. Habitat fragmentation and amphibian conservation: building a tool for assessing landscape matrix connectivity. Comptes Rendus Biologies 326: S132-S139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klemens, M. W. and E. A. Johnson. 2005. Creating a framework for change. p. 349–62. In Johnson, E. A. and M. W. Klemens (eds.) Nature in Fragments: The Legacy of Sprawl. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lathrop, R. G., P. Montesano, J. Tesauro, and B. Zarate. 2005. Statewide mapping and assessment of vernal pool: A New Jersey case study. Journal of Environmental Management 76: 230–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz, S. G. 2003. Isolated wetlands and their functions: an ecological perspective. Wetlands 23: 517–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, D. 2001. The age of management is over. Ecosystems 4: 758–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahaney, W. and M. W. Klemens. Vernal pool conservation policy: the federal, state, provincial, and local context. In A. J. K. Calhoun and P. G. deMaynadier (eds.) Science and Conservation of Vernal Pools in Northeastern North America. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, in press.

  • Moore, E. A. and T. M. Koontz. 2003. A typology of collaborative watershed groups: citizen-based, agency-based, and mixed partnerships. Society and Natural Resources 16: 451–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preisser, E. L., J. Y. Kefer, J. D. Lawrence, and T. W. Clark. 2000. Vernal pool conservation in Connecticut: Assessment and recommendations. Environmental Management 26: 503–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, S. E., L. Fahrig, and H. Gray Merriam. 2000. Landscape complementation and metapopulation effects on leopard frog populations. Ecology 81: 2498–2508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regosin, J. V., B. S. Windmiller, and J. M. Reed. 2003. Terrestrial habitat use and winter densities of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). Journal of Herpetology 37: 390–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockwood, P. 1995. Landscape planning for biodiversity. Landscape and Urban Planning 31: 379–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savan, B. and D. Sider. 2003. Contrasting approaches to community-based research and a case study of community sustainability in Toronto, Canada. Local Environment 8: 303–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch, R. D. 2002. Critical elements for biologically-based recovery plans for aquatic-breeding amphibians. Conservation Biology 16: 619–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch, R. D. and J. R. Bodie. 2003. Biological criteria for buffer zones around wetlands and riparian habitats for amphibians and reptiles. Conservation Biology 17: 1219–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. A. and D. M. Green. 2005. Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibians metapopulations? Ecography 28: 110–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J. W., M. J. Komoroski, A. L. Bryan Jr, and J. Burger. 2000. Relationships among isolated wetland size, hydroperiod, and amphibian species richness: Implications for wetland regulations. Conservation Biology 14: 414–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tappan, A. and M. Marchand. 2004. Identification and Documentation of vernal pools in New Hampshire (second edition). New Hampshire Fish and Game Department, Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program. Concord, NH, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theobald, D. M., R. J. Hobbs, T. Bearly, J. A. Zack, T. Shenk, and W. E. Riebsame. 2000. Incorporating biological information in local land-use decision-making: designing a system for conservation planning. Landscape Ecology 15: 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasseur, L. L. LaFrance, D. Renaud, D. Morin, and T. Audet. 1997. Advisory committee: a powerful tool for helping decision makers in environmental issues. Environmental Management 21: 359–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A. J., L. Uncapher, L. McManigal, L. Hunter Lovins, M. Cureton, and W. D. Browning. 1997. Green Development: Integrating Ecology and Real Estate. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damon B. Oscarson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oscarson, D.B., Calhoun, A.J.K. Developing vernal pool conservation plans at the local level using citizen-scientists. Wetlands 27, 80–95 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[80:DVPCPA]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[80:DVPCPA]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Navigation